311-019 exam Dumps Source : Sun Certified Associate for Java 2 Platform, standard Edition
Test Code : 311-019
Test designation : Sun Certified Associate for Java 2 Platform, standard Edition
Vendor designation : SUN
: 204 real Questions
No fritter trendy time on searhching internet! located genuine supply trendy 311-019 .
It was in fact very beneficial. Your accurate questions and answers helped me spotless 311-019 in first try with 78.75% marks. My marks was 90% however because of terrible marking it got here to 78.Seventy five%. Incredible pastime killexams.com crew..May additionally you obtain all of the success. Thank you.
what's simplest manner to prepare and pass 311-019 exam?
I was a lot dissatisfied in the ones days due to the fact I didnt any time to do together for 311-019 exam prep because of my some daily ordinary toil I own to disburse maximum time on the way, a long distance from my domestic to my toil region. I become a lot involved approximately 311-019 exam, due to the fact time is so proximate to, then at some point my friend advised about killexams.com, that become the turn to my existence, the reply of my all troubles. I could conclude my 311-019 exam prep on the manner effortlessly by means of using my laptop and killexams.com is so dependable and fantastic.
Is there someone who exceeded 311-019 exam?
When I had taken the decision for going to the exam then I got a apt champion for my preparation from the killexams.com which gave me the realness and accountable exercise 311-019 prep classes for the same. Here, I moreover got the opening to win myself checked before sentiment confident of performing well in the course of the preparing for 311-019 and that was a nice thing which made me perfect ready for the exam which I scored well. Thanks to such things from the killexams.
Real test questions of 311-019 exam are available now.
I wanted to drop you a line to thank you for your study materials. This is the first time I own used your cram. I just took the 311-019 today and passed with an 80 percent score. I own to admit that I was skeptical at first but me passing my certification exam definitely proves it. Thanks a lot! Thomas from Calgary, Canada
in which could i locate 311-019 exam examine assist?
The killexams.com is the awesome web page where my goals Come real. With the aid of manner of the usage of the material for the practise certainly introduced the real spark to the studies and severely ended up by course of the usage of acquiring the qualitymarks within the 311-019 exam. Its miles pretty easy to stand any exam with the assist of your own a study material. Thank youplenty for all. withhold up the top class craft toil guys.
Right Place to find 311-019 dumps paper.
Failure to fib in people who means that it changed into the ones very moments that they couldnt determine ways to neglect but now they all understand that whether or no longer or now not there has been some purpose to the Little factor that they couldnt no longer discern really yet those stuff that they werent presupposed to understand so now you should understand that I cleared my 311-019 test and it cease up higher than a few aspect and confident I did with killexams.com and it wasnt the character of abominable aspect at all to check on-line for a alternate and no longer sulk at domestic with my books.
No greater worries while making ready for the 311-019 examination.
I prepared the 311-019 exam with the assist of killexams.com SUN test guidance material. It turned into tangled but standard very useful in passing my 311-019 exam.
it's miles genuinely awesome befriend to own 311-019 latest dumps.
The exercising exam is superb, I passed 311-019 paper with a marks of a hundred percentage. Nicely well worth the fee. I can exist returned for my subsequent certification. To originate with permit me provide you with a colossal thanks for giving me prep dumps for 311-019 exam. It became indeed useful for the coaching of tests and additionally clearing it. You wont faith that i got not a unique solution wrong !!!Such complete exam preparatory dump are notable course to reap immoderate in checks.
found maximum 311-019 Questions in dumps that I prepared.
killexams.com is a notable web page for 311-019 certification dump. When I establish you on the internet, I almost joyed in pleasure because it become exactly what I turned into seeking out. I become searching out a few real and much less steeply-priced assist on line due to the fact I didnt own the time to travel through bunch of books. I discovered enough commemorate question birthright here that proved to exist very useful. I changed into capable of score rightly in my SUN test and Im obliged.
Dont forget about to attempt these real exam questions for 311-019 examination.
I could advocate this questions and answers as a should must every person whos making ready for the 311-019 exam. It became very helpful in getting an persuasion as to what form of questions were coming and which areas to cognizance. The exercise test provided became additionally awesome in getting a sentiment of what to anticipate on exam day. As for the answers keys provided, it became of brilliant assist in recollecting what I had learnt and the explanations provided were smooth to understand and definately delivered cost to my persuasion at the problem.
solar international's Wild Coast solar has done Africa's first net Zero fritter rating from the eco-friendly building Council of South Africa (GBCSA).
"we're delighted that the boom and innovation coming out of the property sector via initiatives just love the Wild Coast sun net Zero fritter certification proves to the relaxation of the world that they can certainly do sustainability and environmental concerns at the heart of how they design, build, and operate superior, greener structures and precincts - congratulations to solar overseas for demonstrating astounding environmental leadership," mentioned Manfred Braune, GBCSA managing govt: sector building and transformation, following the announcement.
As a piece of their sustainability adventure, solar international has embarked on an aggressive Zero-Waste-to-Landfill initiative to exist achieved by using the conclusion of 2020 at all its South African units. Wild Coast sun is the first unit within the neighborhood to achieve this goal. Jennifer van Niekerk of GCX, the accredited expert who conducted the web Zero Certification explained, "The Wild Coast solar’s fritter administration strategy contains the composting of organic fritter onsite, recycling of recyclables by course of skill of accepted recyclers, donation and resale of reusable items and the manufacturing of bricks from non-effective non-recyclable waste."
Brick manufacturing and recycling is performed offsite with the guidance of a fritter contractor, youngsters wide measures were do in region to slash back, reuse, sunder and deal with 70% of the fritter produced on site.
"Our zero fritter to landfill mission is only one of many initiatives they are implementing. The triple benefit of decreasing and converting fritter into a valuable resource is that they achieve their commitment to exist environmentally in charge, they aid the endemic economy via job advent, and they minimise the own an result on on their bottom line. I muster that a win-win-win situation," added head of sustainability at solar queer Jannette Horn.
eco-friendly constructions own to conclude greater to fix their local weather emergency
After greater than three a long time of talk concerning the lore of constructing green, now they own nevertheless didn't exchange the course they design and assemble structures...
Meg Holden and Rebecca Holt 6 Feb 2019As an fundamental step in the success of their zero fritter to landfill solution, the Wild Coast solar has positioned tremendous accent on the separation of biological fritter at supply in all its personal kitchens. It has supported, informed and helped improve a full-time enterprise to purge organic fritter from the kitchens and character the fritter to win rid of all contaminants via hand. a different commercial enterprise, moreover educated and assisted by course of the Wild Coast sun, then composts the organic fritter and makes consume of it in an onsite vegetable garden, the bear from which is offered back to the inn for consume within the kitchens. An extra requirement of the certification, the Wild Coast sun had been required to satisfy birthright here standards: do into result onsite fritter recycling, habits impartial fritter mosey audits of ongoing consumables and own an updated operational fritter and materials management plan.
"Waste may quiet not exist considered as whatever thing to exist disposed and as a value - it is going to exist viewed as a aid. Landfill websites are filling up, and they own to prepare for a complete shift in considering around waste. it's a no brainer that eco-friendly building, including fritter minimisation and reuse, isn't any longer a lofty finest on the continent and the leisure of the realm, they will now discern the tangible merits which are tied to sustainability from an African context and the proven fact that inside a number of years the South African traffic anticipates that they are going to own a a apt deal higher degree of eco-friendly constructing endeavor is captivating," talked about Braune.
The classes included in Java programming certificates courses are essentially technical and vocational classes with Little to no widely wide-spread education necessities. Some inevitable examples of classes included in such programs consist of:
From 2014-2024, computer programmers had been projected to peer an 8% decline in employment opportunities, pointed out the U.S. Bureau of Labor records. The suggest wages of desktop programmers own been $eighty four,360 in may additionally 2015.continuing education and Certification
The solar Microsystems subsidiary of the Oracle corporation is the only entity to present solar certifications (www.sun.com). youngsters the enterprise offers a couple of various kinds of certifications, one of the vital standard kinds is the sun licensed Java Programmer (SCJP). Most college students who finished a certificate software in Java programming are eligible to sit for the SCJP examination. The assessments are offered at numerous testing websites around the country.
grasp's degree classes are moreover obtainable for graduates with solar certification, including the grasp of Science (M.S.) in software Engineering, M.S. in laptop counsel techniques or M.S. in guidance methods. These programs can prepare IT authorities for career development or extra anatomize in a linked container.
college students drawn to Java programming can subscribe to a solar certification software to exist extra marketable or expert as a laptop programmer. master's diploma programs and other styles of certifications can exist establish as well.
Utilities had been sluggish to undertake IoT networking as a result of long improve cycles and interoperability complexities throughout dissimilar purposes with differing network wants. Yet, more and more, they hear their utility purchasers emphasize the deserve to simplify and champion enormous-scale outdoor networks that address an array of solutions from sapient metering and distribution automation, to demand response and renewable power integration.
At DistribuTECH, they shared how Cisco’s continuing innovation is meeting this challenge. They showcased their replete portfolio of utility trade options that consist of Cisco Resilient Mesh and their FAN routers, aim-developed to enhance interoperability. And they introduced that Cisco is the primary to obtain Wi-sun territory belt community (FAN) 1.0 interoperability certification for their IR509 Cisco Resilient Mesh industrial router.
Why is interoperability so vital? Let’s acquire a glance.
The problem of interoperability
usually, utilities and sapient cities ought to fulfill a variety of networking consume situations, with options from various vendors, managed through different operations agencies and even conclusion valued clientele. as an instance, an influence utility might moreover consume smart grid, superior Metering Infrastructure (AMI) and Distribution Automation (DA) networks. Interoperability becomes much more captious in the event that they should integrate distributed energy supplies (DER), which may comprehend options where they don’t own direct handle, corresponding to domestic photo voltaic, electric automobile charging stations, or sapient highway lighting.
First era sensible grid AMI and DA networks commonly used proprietary mesh networking technologies, partly IP-enabled and the consume of proprietary security protocols. but that continually meant security turned into much less scrutinized, much less strong, and can own had unknown vulnerabilities. devoid of enough interoperability, utilities had been compelled to first pick a community infrastructure dealer, and then require all of their grid machine companies (e.g., for line sensors, meters, cap bank controllers) to combine/certify communication modules from that network dealer.
The result is a really inefficient, time- and value-intensive process for every person involved. A utility usually has to wait a very long time except the integration and territory compliance is completed for all of the grid instruments earlier than they could deploy and consume the network effectively. in the meantime, they could continue to shun diverse networks every with different verbal exchange applied sciences for distinctive functions (e.g., line sensor vs. volt-var handle) and continue to contend with immoderate renovation can charge, complexity, and fragility of their methods.
Cisco IoT solutions purpose to reduce interoperability complexities with intent-based mostly networking, and befriend speed implementation through bringing companions together via their IoT DevNet software.
constructing cozy and legitimate interoperability
while protection and reliability are accurate of intellect for their utility clients, interoperability tends to acquire a lower back seat in conversations. Yet interoperability is vital for persisted boom in IoT – and that’s the Place they are available in. Cisco is leading the pack with their IR509 router, the primary with Wi-sun FAN 1.0 interoperability certification.
Wi-sun FAN 1.0 offers for basic interoperability of instruments for network discovery, association, authentication, key exchange and rotation, encryption, RPL routing, and IPv6 address task. Wi-solar compliance is gaining consideration, and that has both network companies and gadget companies scrambling to win certified. With utilities enabling sapient metropolis infrastructures love street lights, EV charging, and sensible parking, a legion of vendors and purposes are converging on the equal community, making wider adoption of Wi-sun inevitable.
meanwhile, as Wi-solar is evolving toward FAN 2.0 necessities, Cisco is preserving tempo to exist in a position. We’re continuing to toil on advanced aspects such as time distribution, adaptive information expense and modulation, peer-to-peer verbal exchange, QoS and comfy certificate re-enrollment.
Interoperability is a captious component in attaining IoT success – and we’ll win you there.
While it is very arduous stint to pick accountable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people win ripoff due to choosing wrong service. Killexams.com obtain it confident to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients Come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and attribute because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client confidence is considerable to us. Specially they acquire care of killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If you discern any mistaken report posted by their competitors with the designation killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something love this, just withhold in repartee that there are always putrid people damaging reputation of apt services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams exercise questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their sample questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
922-111 exercise questions | C9020-971 braindumps | 8002 exam questions | HP0-K03 exam prep | CPIM-BSP sample test | LOT-442 questions answers | 000-428 test prep | HP0-781 braindumps | 700-020 exam prep | COBIT5 test questions | 250-365 exercise questions | 642-162 test prep | 000-348 mock exam | GD0-100 VCE | VCS-274 brain dumps | TB0-116 free pdf | 9A0-314 braindumps | 000-022 exercise test | 310-231 brain dumps | HP2-H37 dumps questions |
311-019 real Exam Questions by killexams.com
killexams.com SUN Certification study guides are setup by IT experts. Bunches of understudies own been whining that there are an immoderate number of questions in such a significant number of training exams and study aid, and they are recently can not afford to manage the cost of any more. Seeing killexams.com specialists toil out this far reaching rendition while quiet assurance that all the learning is secured after profound research and exam.
SUN 311-019 certified are rare all over the globe, and moreover the traffic arrangements gave via them are being grasped by means of each one amongst the businesses. they requisite helped in employing a giant style of firms on the far side any doubt of accomplishment. so much attaining progressing to understanding of 311-019 certifications are needed to certify as an considerable practicality, and moreover the specialists showed through them are hugely prestigious among associations. We provide actual 311-019 pdf test Questions and Answers brain dumps in arrangements. PDF version and exam simulator. Pass SUN 311-019 exam unexpectedly and with success. The 311-019 braindumps PDF is on the killexams.com for downloading and printing. you will exist able to print 311-019 brain dumps study usher and carry with you while you are on vacation or travelling. Their pass rate is immoderate to 98.9% and moreover the equivalence imbue among their 311-019 information faith manual and actual test is cardinal in elegant of their seven-year employment history. Does one requisite successs at 311-019 exam in handiest first attempt? I am inevitable currently once analyzing for the SUN 311-019 real test.
if you are scanning for 311-019 exercise Test containing real Test Questions, you are at rectify put. killexams.com own amassed database of questions from Actual Exams remembering the ultimate objective to empower you to map and pass your exam on the fundamental attempt. all arrangement materials on the site are Up To Date and verified by their authorities.
killexams.com give latest and updated Pass4sure exercise Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for unusual syllabus of SUN 311-019 Exam. exercise their real Questions and Answers to improve your insight and pass your exam with elevated Marks. They guarantee your accomplishment in the Test Center, covering each one of the subjects of exam and enhance your lore of the 311-019 exam. Pass with no mistrust with their remedy questions.
Our 311-019 Exam PDF contains Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Dumps verified and certified including references and clarifications (where material). Their goal to assemble the Questions and Answers isn't just to pass the exam at first attempt anyway Really improve Your lore about the 311-019 exam focuses.
311-019 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in elevated attribute Study usher that you can download in your Computer or some other device and start setting up your 311-019 exam. Print Complete 311-019 Study Guide, pass on with you when you are at Vacations or Traveling and savor your Exam Prep. You can win to updated 311-019 Exam from your online record at whatever point.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for all Orders
Download your Sun Certified Associate for Java 2 Platform, standard Edition Study usher instantly after buying and Start Preparing Your Exam Prep birthright Now!
311-019 Practice Test | 311-019 examcollection | 311-019 VCE | 311-019 study guide | 311-019 practice exam | 311-019 cram
Killexams NS0-131 dumps questions | Killexams 212-055 free pdf | Killexams CABM test prep | Killexams 771-101 cheat sheets | Killexams 1Z0-530 cram | Killexams 920-246 free pdf download | Killexams 1Z0-493 real questions | Killexams E20-007 test prep | Killexams HP0-490 study guide | Killexams A2070-580 exam prep | Killexams HP0-M26 exercise questions | Killexams 300-360 exercise test | Killexams 9A0-092 sample test | Killexams ST0-130 test questions | Killexams C9030-644 examcollection | Killexams 000-400 braindumps | Killexams HPE0-J77 questions answers | Killexams 000-M20 study guide | Killexams EW0-300 dumps | Killexams 250-441 exercise Test |
Killexams HP2-E15 study guide | Killexams F50-536 braindumps | Killexams 1T6-222 test prep | Killexams RH133 braindumps | Killexams ITIL-F pdf download | Killexams 3101-1 questions and answers | Killexams HP0-J67 free pdf | Killexams 1Z0-863 study guide | Killexams 600-210 questions and answers | Killexams 3104 VCE | Killexams S90-01A exam questions | Killexams 1Z0-971 free pdf download | Killexams LOT-829 exercise questions | Killexams CPCE questions answers | Killexams ASC-066 exercise test | Killexams IFSEA-CFM cram | Killexams A2040-921 bootcamp | Killexams P2050-003 real questions | Killexams HP0-087 exercise exam | Killexams P2080-096 exercise test |
SAN MATEO, Calif., Nov. 20, 2001 (PRIMEZONE) -- Appeal Virtual Machines, a technology leader in producing manageable, elevated performance virtual machines for the Java(TM) platform, today announced that it has achieved replete Java 2 Platform, standard Edition (J2SE(TM)) compatibility for the company's JRockit product for the Windows2000/NT operating systems. birth with release 3.0, which is shipping today, the JRockit products are certified 100% Java compatible. replete compatibility for JRockit gives companies the selection to select a Java virtual machine that can exist integrated, optimized and independently configured and managed for their unique operating environment.
The JRockit 3.0 version available today moreover has significant functional enhancements including significant improvements for multiprocessor environments. JRockit 3.0 moreover introduces a unique management console for the virtual machine for Java technology. This is a novel feature which allows companies running the Java technology to monitor and manage the performance of the virtual machine and the Java application running with it. Administrators can view the operating characteristics of the virtual machine and the Java application and can exist automatically notified of changes in resource availability or changes in operating characteristics as they occur. Based on this information administrators can identify bottlenecks in performance and change operating and environmental parameters to optimize performance and availability.
"Appeal is very pleased to exist designated Java compatible for Windows 2000/NT," said Dave Parker, CEO, Appeal Virtual Machines. "Appeal's unique value is empowering higher performance Java solutions for customers. Delivering a manageable, tunable, 100% compatible virtual machine for Java technology improves customer's control over their Java environments and increases productivity of all Java related resources."
"As a member of the Java Community Process(SM) program, Appeal has contributed toward the broad adoption and consume of the Java 2 Platform, standard Edition," said Bill Pataky, Group Product Marketing Manager, Sun Microsystems. "With the completion of the J2SE compatibility requirements, they Look forward to the delivery of Appeal products that will enhance the manageability and productivity of customers' Java applications."
The specifications for J2SE define the standard for developing multi-tier enterprise applications. JRockit is designed and optimized for the demands of server side execution of Java based applications, including multi-user scalability, selectable non-disruptive garbage collectors, champion for multiprocessors, and the aptitude to monitor and manage the execution of Java applications. Sun's JCK certification requires that products pass a comprehensive succession of approximately 5000 compatibility tests.
About Appeal Virtual Machines
Appeal Virtual Machines has offices in Stockholm, Stuttgart and San Mateo California. Appeal's JRockit product line is a family of superior virtual machines for Java, providing customers and partners with manageable, elevated performance Java operating environments. JRockit is a line of products available for Solaris, Linux and Windows NT/2000 operating systems. The company was founded in 1998. Visit Appeal at www.jrockit.com for more information, benchmarks and a free affliction license.
Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, Java, J2SE, Java Community Process, and The Network Is The Computer are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries.Appeal Public Relations, San Mateo 408 832 5244 Appeal Public Relations, Stockholm +46 (0)70 710 62 83
Stockholm, SWEDENAppeal Public Relations, San Mateo 408 832 5244 Appeal Public Relations, Stockholm +46 (0)70 710 62 83
This chapter explains what Android is, how and why it was developed, and where the platform fits in to the established mobile marketplace.This chapter is from the bespeak
The mobile development community is at a tipping point. Mobile users demand more choice, more opportunities to customize their phones, and more functionality. Mobile operators want to provide value-added content to their subscribers in a manageable and lucrative way. Mobile developers want the license to develop the powerful mobile applications users demand with minimal roadblocks to success. Finally, handset manufacturers want a stable, secure, and affordable platform to power their devices. Upuntil now unique mobile platform has adequately addressed the needs of all the parties.
Enter Android, which is a potential game-changer for the mobile development community. An innovative and open platform, Android is well positioned to address the growing needs of the mobile marketplace.
This chapter explains what Android is, how and why it was developed, and where the platform fits in to the established mobile marketplace.
To understand what makes Android so compelling, they must examine how mobile development has evolved and how Android differs from competing platforms.Way Back When
Remember course back when a phone was just a phone? When they relied on fixed landlines? When they ran for the phone instead of pulling it out of their pocket? When they lost their friends at a crowded ballgame and waited around for hours hoping to reunite? When they forgot the grocery list (Figure 1.1) and had to find a payphone or drive back home again?
Figure 1.1 Mobile phones own become a crucial shopping accessory.
Those days are long gone. Today, commonplace problems love these are easily solved with a one-button speed dial or a simple text message love “WRU?” or “20?” or “Milk and?”
Our mobile phones withhold us safe and connected. Nowadays, they roam around freely, relying on their phones not only to withhold in finger with friends, family, and coworkers, but moreover to inform us where to go, what to do, and how to conclude it. Even the most domestic of events appear to revolve around my mobile phone.
Consider the following true, but slightly enhanced for effect, story:
My point here? Mobile phones can unravel just about anything—and they depend on them for everything these days.
You notice that I used half a dozen different mobile applications over the course of this story. Each application was developed by a different company and had a different user interface. Some were well designed; others not so much. I paid for some of the applications, and others came on my phone.
As a user, I establish the sustain functional, but not terribly inspiring. As a mobile developer, I wished for an opening to create a more seamless and powerful application that could handle all I’d done and more. I wanted to build a better bat trap, if you will.
Before Android, mobile developers faced many roadblocks when it came to writing applications. building the better application, the unique application, the competing application, the hybrid application, and incorporating many common tasks such as messaging and calling in a intimate course were often unrealistic goals.
To understand why, let’s acquire a brief Look at the history of mobile software development.“The Brick”
The Motorola DynaTAC 8000X was the first commercially available cell phone. First marketed in 1983, it was 13 x 1.75 x 3.5 inches in dimension, weighed about 2.5 pounds, and allowed you to talk for a Little more than half an hour. It retailed for $3,995, plus hefty monthly service fees and per-minute charges.
We called it “The Brick,” and the nickname stuck for many of those early mobile phones they alternatively loved and hated. About the size of a brick, with a battery power just long enough for half a conversation, these early mobile handsets were mostly seen in the hands of traveling traffic execs, security personnel, and the wealthy. First-generation mobile phones were just too expensive. The service charges lonesome would bankrupt the impartial person, especially when roaming.
Early mobile phones were not particularly replete featured. (Although, even the Motorola DynaTAC, shown in design 1.2, had many of the buttons we’ve Come to know well, such as the SEND, END, and CLR buttons.) These early phones did Little more than obtain and receive calls and, if you were lucky, there was a simple contacts application that wasn’t impossible to use.
Figure 1.2 The first commercially available mobile phone: the Motorala DynaTAC.
These first-generation mobile phones were designed and developed by the handset manufacturers. Competition was fierce and trade secrets were closely guarded. Manufacturers didn’t want to expose the internal workings of their handsets, so they usually developed the phone software in-house. As a developer, if you weren’t piece of this inner circle, you had no opening to write applications for the phones.
It was during this epoch that they saw the first “time-waster” games originate to appear. Nokia was celebrated for putting the 1970s video game Snake on some of its earliest monochrome phones. Other manufacturers followed, adding games love Pong, Tetris, and Tic-Tac-Toe.
These early phones were flawed, but they did something important—they changed the course people thought about communication. As mobile phone prices dropped, batteries improved, and reception areas grew, more and more people began carrying these handy devices. Soon mobile phones were more than just a novelty.
Customers began pushing for more features and more games. But, there was a problem. The handset manufacturers didn’t own the motivation or the resources to build every application users wanted. They needed some course to provide a portal for entertainment and information services without allowing direct access to the handset.
And what better course to provide these services than the Internet?Wireless Application Protocol (WAP)
It turned out allowing direct phone access to the Internet didn’t scale well for mobile.
When the first clamshell phone, the Motorola StarTAC, was released in 1996, it merely had a LCD 10-digit segmented display. (Later models would add a dot-matrix character display.) Meanwhile, Nokia released one of the first slider phones, the 8110—fondly referred to as “The Matrix Phone,” as the phone was heavily used in films. The 8110 could pomp four lines of text with 13 characters per line. design 1.3 shows some of the common phone form factors.
Figure 1.3 Various mobile phone form factors: the candy bar, the slider, and the clamshell.
With their postage stamp-sized low-resolution screens and limited storage and processing power, these phones couldn’t handle the data-intensive operations required by traditional Web browsers. The bandwidth requirements for data transmission were moreover costly to the user.
The Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) standard emerged to address these concerns. Simply put, WAP was a stripped-down version of HTTP, which is the backbone protocol of the Internet. Unlike traditional Web browsers, WAP browsers were designed to shun within the reminiscence and bandwidth constraints of the phone. Third-party WAP sites served up pages written in a markup language called Wireless Markup Language (WML). These pages were then displayed on the phone’s WAP browser. Users navigated as they would on the Web, but the pages were much simpler in design.
The WAP solution was noteworthy for handset manufacturers. The pressure was off—they could write one WAP browser to ship with the handset and depend on developers to Come up with the content users wanted.
The WAP solution was noteworthy for mobile operators. They could provide a custom WAP portal, directing their subscribers to the content they wanted to provide, and rake in the data charges associated with browsing, which were often high.
Developers and content providers didn’t deliver. For the first time, developers had a casual to develop content for phone users, and some did so, with limited success.
Most of the early WAP sites were extensions of current branded Web sites, such as CNN.com and ESPN.com, looking for unusual ways to extend their readership. Suddenly phone users accessed the news, stock market quotes, and sports scores on their phones.
Commercializing WAP applications was difficult, and there was no built-in billing mechanism. Some of the most current commercial WAP applications that emerged during this time were simple wallpaper and ringtone catalogues, allowing users to personalize their phones for the first time. For example, the users browsed a WAP site and requested a specific item. They filled out a simple order form with their phone number and their handset model. It was up to the content provider to deliver an image or audio file compatible with the given phone. Payment and verification were handled through various premium-priced delivery mechanisms such as Short Message Service (SMS), Enhanced Messaging Service (EMS), Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), and WAP Push.
WAP browsers, especially in the early days, were late and frustrating. Typing long URLs with the numeric keypad was onerous. WAP pages were often difficult to navigate. Most WAP sites were written once for all phones and did not account for individual phone specifications. It didn’t matter if the end-user’s phone had a colossal color screen or a postage stamp-sized monochrome one; the developer couldn’t tailor the user’s experience. The result was a mediocre and not very compelling sustain for everyone involved.
Content providers often didn’t bother with a WAP site and instead just advertised SMS short codes on TV and in magazines. In this case, the user sent a premium SMS message with a request for a specific wallpaper or ringtone, and the content provider sent it back. Mobile operators generally liked these delivery mechanisms because they received a great portion of each messaging fee.
WAP fell short of commercial expectations. In some markets, such as Japan, it flourished, whereas in others, love the United States, it failed to acquire off. Handset screens were too miniature for surfing. Reading a sentence fragment at a time, and then waiting seconds for the next segment to download, ruined the user experience, especially because every second of downloading was often charged to the user. Critics began to muster WAP “Wait and Pay.”
Finally, the mobile operators who provided the WAP portal (the default home page loaded when you started your WAP browser) often restricted which WAP sites were accessible. The portal allowed the operator to restrict the number of sites users could browse and to funnel subscribers to the operator’s preferred content providers and exclude competing sites. This kindly of walled garden approach further discouraged third-party developers, who already faced difficulties in monetizing applications, from writing applications.Proprietary Mobile Platforms
It came as no dumbfound when users wanted more—they will always want more.
Writing robust applications such as graphic-intensive video games with WAP was nearly impossible. The 18-year-old to 25-year-old sweet-spot demographic—the kids with the disposable income most likely to personalize their phones with wallpapers and ringtones—looked at their portable gaming systems and asked for a device that was both a phone and a gaming device or a phone and a music player. They argued that if devices such as Nintendo’s Game Boy could provide hours of entertainment with only five buttons, why not just add phone capabilities? Others looked to their digital cameras, Palms, Blackberries, iPods, and even their laptops and asked the very question. The market seemed to exist teetering on the edge of device convergence.
Memory was getting cheaper; batteries were getting better; and PDAs and other embedded devices were birth to shun compact versions of common operating systems such as Linux and Windows. The traditional desktop application developer was suddenly a player in the embedded device market, especially with Smartphone technologies such as Windows Mobile, which they establish familiar.
Handset manufacturers realized that if they wanted to continue to sell traditional handsets, they needed to change their protectionist policies pertaining to handset design and expose their internal frameworks, at least, to some extent.
A variety of different proprietary platforms emerged—and developers are quiet actively creating applications for them. Some Smartphone devices ran Palm OS (now Garnet OS) and RIM Blackberry OS. Sun Microsystems took its current Java platform and J2ME emerged (now known as Java Micro Edition [Java ME]). Chipset maker Qualcomm developed and licensed its Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless (BREW). Other platforms, such as Symbian OS, were developed by handset manufacturers such as Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Motorola, and Samsung. The Apple iPhone OS (OS X iPhone) joined the ranks in 2008. design 1.4 shows several different phones, all of which own different development platforms.
Figure 1.4 Phones from various mobile device platforms.
Many of these platforms own associated developer programs. These programs withhold the developer communities small, vetted, and under contractual agreements on what they can and cannot do. These programs are often required and developers must pay for them.
Each platform has benefits and drawbacks. Of course, developers cherish to debate over which platform is “the best.” (Hint: It’s usually the platform we’re currently developing for.)
The verity is no one platform has emerged victorious. Some platforms are best suited for commercializing games and making millions—if your company has brand backing. Other platforms are more open and suitable for the hobbyist or upright market applications. No mobile platform is best suited for all possible applications. As a result, the mobile phone has become increasingly fragmented, with all platforms sharing piece of the pie.
For manufacturers and mobile operators, handset product lines became complicated fast. Platform market penetration varies greatly by region and user demographic. Instead of choosing just one platform, manufacturers and operators own been forced to sell phones for all the different platforms to compete. We’ve even seen some handsets supporting multiple platforms. (For instance, Symbian phones often moreover champion J2ME.)
The mobile developer community has become as fragmented as the market. It’s nearly impossible to withhold track of all the changes in the market. Developer specialty niches own formed. The platform development requirements vary greatly. Mobile software developers toil with distinctly different programming environments, different tools, and different programming languages. Porting among the platforms is often costly and not straightforward. Keeping track of handset configurations and testing requirements, signing and certification programs, carrier relationships, and application marketplaces own become tangled spin-off businesses of their own.
It’s a nightmare for the ACME Company wanting a mobile application. Should they develop a J2ME application? BREW? iPhone? Windows Mobile? Everyone has a different kindly of phone. ACME is forced to pick one or, worse, all of the above. Some platforms allow for free applications, whereas others conclude not. upright market application opportunities are limited and expensive.
As a result, many wonderful applications own not reached their desired users, and many other noteworthy ideas own not been developed at all.
Here is a brief comparison between Oracle 9i and SQL Server 2000. In my view, Oracle comes out ahead in this c...
SQL Server is only operable on the Windows platform, a major limitation for it to exist an enterprise solution. Oracle is available on multiple platforms such as Windows, all flavors of Unix from vendors such as IBM, Sun, Digital, HP, Sequent, etc. and VAX-VMS, as well as MVS. The multi-platform nature of Oracle makes it a legal enterprise solution.
Locking and concurrency
SQL Server has no multi-version consistency model, which means that "writers block readers and readers block writers" to ensure data integrity. In contrast, with Oracle, the rule is "readers don't block writers and writers don't block readers." This is possible without compromising data integrity because Oracle will dynamically re-create a read-consistent image for a reader of any requested data that has been changed but not yet committed. In other words, the reader will discern the data as it was before the writer began changing it (until the writer commits). SQL Server's locking scheme is much simpler (less mature) and will result in a lot of delays/waits in a cumbersome OLTP environment.
Also, SQL Server will escalate row locks to page flush locks when too many rows on a page are locked. This locks rows which are uninvolved in any updates for no apt reason.
Performance and tuning
Here are some kick types missing in SQL Server that exist in Oracle.
PL/SQL versus T-SQL
In clustering technology, Oracle is light years ahead, since SQL Server has nothing love Oracle Parallel Server/RAC -- two instances acting on the very data in active-active configurations. And with the unusual version of Parallel Server in Oracle 9i, renamed as the Oracle real Application Clusters, there is diskless contention handling of read-read, read-write, write-read, and write-write contention between the instances. This diskless contention handling is called Cache Fusion, and it means for the first time, any application can exist placed in a cluster without any changes, and it scales upwards by just adding another machine to the cluster. Microsoft has nothing love this.
SQL Server is clearly positioned between Microsoft Access and Oracle in terms of functionality, performance and scalability. It is a apt workgroup-level solution, a very quick time to market solution, and is very simple to consume and administer. Oracle is much more advanced and has more to offer for larger applications with both OLTP and data warehouse applications. Its unusual clustering features are example for Application Service Providers (ASPs) on the Internet, who can now start with a cluster of two miniature servers and grow by just adding a server when they requisite to.Reader Feedback
Lucy L. writes: I own worked with both and mostly disagree with the author's observations, but I would love to mention the other side of this comment: "No "before" event triggers (only "after" event triggers) and no row triggers (only statement)." In SQL server, the statement-level trigger gives you access to the pseudo-tables INSERTED and DELETED. This means you can effect an action for each row operated on in a setwise style rather than in the row-at-a-time style you must consume in Oracle. This is a much better deal in bulk operations where an Oracle row-level trigger can consume up much of the performance advantage of bulk inserts or updates.
Balaji S. writes: I reflect it is fundamentally wrong to compare SQL Server with Oracle. I disagree with all the points mentioned in the article. Oracle is a more age and advanced product than SQL Server. Also, I personally faced a problem when they implemented a CRM application over SQL Server. I was told that SQL Server has a circumscribe on the size of the row and that if the row is greater than a inevitable size, then you requisite to split the row and insert into two tables with parent child relationship. This happened about a year back and I am not confident whether it is fixed or not. The company tried to migrate their CRM from Oracle to SQL Server but only ended up spending millions to find out that it is not going to work. They are continuing with Oracle now.
Harvinder S. writes: I establish your article very informative. Here are some observations:
1) Quote: "Also, SQL Server will escalate row locks to page flush locks when too many rows on a page are locked." From my understanding, SQL Server never escalates row flush lock to page flush lock. It will aquire page/row lock at the birth and escalate to table flush lock if needed.
2) Quote: "In T-SQL there are significant extensions to the ANSI SQL-92 standard which means converting applications to a different database later will exist a code challenge re-write. The INNER JOIN, LEFT OUTER, birthright OUTER connect syntax differs from the classic JOIN." I find these extensions to exist very beneficial for writing efficient code.
3) I totally disagree that SQL Server should own the following features:
I hope the next article will exist present SQL Server's advantages over Oracle.
Patrick M. writes: simple dribble. Clearly the author is an Oracle bigot. For someone that is certified in MS, he confident did win some major items wrong about MS-SQL. Clearly he develops with Oracle and has only played with SQL Server, otherwise he would know better.
I probably could travel on, but you win the point. This article was a MS-SQL bashing article, not a "differences" article. I find it statistically impossible that MS-SQL doesn't conclude ANYTHING better than Oracle.
Santosh B. writes: I mind to disagree with the reader review of Patrick M. Oracle is a powerful system but SQL is very powerful too and the author has got some things totally wrong. My points are:
1) You can conclude any sort of writing to and reading from external files , communicate with external apps everything by using external stored procedures. So these are com objects and dlls. but so what ? If you can consume java to conclude this in oracle, you can consume ext stored procs in TSQL.
2) My understanding is that LEFT OUTER connect etc are ANSI standards! And Oracle has only now started supporting this. It makes coding so much more elegant especially when writing dynamic stored procedures.
3) Has the author not heard of Enterprises that shun Microsoft platform? conclude they not successfully consume SQL Server? Hasn't SQL Server consistently topped all benchmarks?
4) The SQL system is capable of tuning at low levels if you requisite to and in any case you requisite more knobs in Oracle since it caters to different platforms. The absence or presence of 100 tunable features doesn't in itself obtain for a better database.
5) Partitioning is possible in SQL server and there are features love Distributed Partitioning.
6) Sequence objects are not an ANSI standard anyway. And besides, Oracle doesn't own IDENTITY properties for columns.
7) Who needs SQLNETtype connectivity really? They can conclude the very by using ODBC DSN names and in .NET you consume config files. You don't requisite to change your code.
8) Can he prove that Log Shipping is not reliable? Ok.. so 9i RAC is very powerful. I accept that, but instead of dismissing SQL's solutions, he'd better prove it.
This wasn't a comparison. More love a rant...
Earl C. writes: I absolutely disagree that Oracle is superior to SQL Server in the course that a Rolls Royce is superior to my Nissan Sentra. So why am I not driving a Rolls Royce? I guess the reply to that one is that I cannot afford a Rolls Royce and I conclude not requisite a Rolls Royce for my trips to Wal-Mart. My point is that for most companies and most databases SQL Server is apt enough. I only wish that Oracle offered a much cheaper version of their product with fewer advanced features. By the way, OEM 9i is course better than SQL Server Enterprise Manager but of course you must conclude some toil to set up OEM.
Andy W. writes: I've worked with both SQL Server (yes, the most current stable version) and Oracle 9i. Attempts at comparison is pointless: It's love comparing Little league baseball to the major leagues.
There simply is no course to rationalize away the platform dependency issue with SQL Server. Folks that attempt to conclude so, only emphasize their color for the MS platform and own Little regard for TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) and ROI (Return on Investment) issues that confront IT management, especially in the cost conscious and competitive marketplace they puss today.
Don't exist overly concerned about the differences in the features, implementation and robustness of the two databases. SQL Server is a puerile and immature product that eventually will proximate the gap. What you are investing in is a long-term vendor relationship and you must study very carefully all aspects of that relationship, including licensing, support, standards compliance and portability. Migrating to a unusual RDBMS is an extremely difficult and expensive process and essentially means you made the wrong choice. Technology exists to serve the business, and mindful analysis of current and future traffic requirements should exist the primary consideration when evaluating database technologies.
Don B. writes: Loved the article! I'm cheerful that this valorous DBA has the guts to converse the verity against the Microsoft vaporware.
Bob S. writes: Having worked with MS SQL Server and Oracle and knowing that each own strengths and weaknesses, I'm surprised the author used such flimsy arguments for Oracle and against MS SQL Server. Also, some of the feedback lacks real insight.
Consider the author's pretension that Oracle has packages and SQL Server does not. Oracle uses packages with their PL/SQL software. They are wrappers for procedures but own more meaning than just being wrappers as the header and corpse of the package is designed much the very course an Ada package is created and used. SQL Server does not own this. They consume the term differently. Both author and responders are talking past each other.
Personally, I love Oracle better for most DB applications. However, SQL Server is so easy to toil with, especially for smaller databases. Backup and recovery is a breeze. Oracle is a Cadillac of RDBMS. For great (100+ GB) databases I cannot imagine trying to effect a recovery on anything less than with an Oracle platform. PL/SQL is a much better language for developing SQL applications. Also, the exception is great. Locking strategy is better for cumbersome applications. However, Oracle is over-kill for a lot of smaller applications. The real key for most business's is that they requisite to know there information requirements. If your information requirements are small, don't fritter your time on using Oracle. If your information requirements are greater than this and you want the capability of being able to consume either Win2k or Unix, stick with Oracle. It's that simple.
All of this talk about who is better than the other or who has what is a lot of wasted air. Both conclude a apt job. As for the author, please research these matters out before making bold statements that are really not completely accurate. Your prejudice really clouds the picture for the non-informed.
Roger P. writes: I disagree with Patrick -- this is purely SQL bashing and doesn't issue to exist any form of attempt at a real comparison.
Locking and Concurrency - stating that SQL Server's locking architecture is less age is incorrect. The locking architecture is designed to process requests faster, as is evident by the TPC benchmarks (www.tpc.org), and is different than how Oracle handles it, so what?
"SQL Server's locking scheme is much simpler (less mature) and will result in a lot of delays/waits in a cumbersome OLTP environment." It's a needy craftsman that blames his tools. I stake I could acquire that environment and resolve any of those delay/wait issues through code or schema changes or even server configuration. Maintaining locks on objects is piece of keeping transactions atomic in any dB environment. Row to page to table escalation reduces resource utilization overhead from trying to manage too many locks. If locks are an issue you should try running more frequent commits. In Oracle when a lock is encoutered the transaction goes through the log looking for the ultimate known apt value. The implications of this are a query could certainly recrudesce a result set that was not expected if instead it had waited for the current lock/update/insert to complete. It's all a matter of how you view this. There are pros and cons on either side.
Oracle costs more than twice as much and isn't as feature loaded for the groundwork cost. For example, out-of-the box SQL Server provides tools to operate in a heterogenous environment. Oracle charges quiet more for those tools after you pay the groundwork cost. Then they quiet imbue more for maintenance. Microsoft provides all of their updates free of charge.
SQL Server does not require downtime for any character of backups. Despite what the writer says, log shipping is an extremely inexpensive and accountable means of replicating data to a standby server. Scriping a DCL process in the standard edition for log shipping is a simple stint as well.
"In SQL Server, the DBA has no "real" control over sorting and cache reminiscence allocation. The reminiscence allocation is decided only globally in the server properties reminiscence folder, and that applies for all reminiscence and not CACHING, SORTING, etc." Microsoft's goal here is to obtain these systems more self tuning and less prone to human error. This means that some things are not available to the DBA to change. In the writer's example he moreover mentions page and extent size, I'd counter that in SQL you don't own to worry about data fragmentation any more as the kernel manages and mantains this. As future releases Come out this will become more and more evident. Managing database properites in ASCII files is archaic, matter to error and inconsistencies and is, in modest terms, the wrong course to shun things.
"SQL Server is clearly positioned between Microsoft Access and Oracle in terms of functionality, performance and scalability." Puh-lease! It wasn't even until the release of 9i that Oracle started taking a serious Look at management features. The only performance advantage Oracle has had was on the 64-bit platform and that advantage is now gone. SQL Server is faster, takes fewer DBAs to support, costs less, offers more robust tools and features that directly contribute to a company's bottom line than Oracle does. Oracle features and it's pricing model contribute only to Oracle's bottom line.
"In SQL Server there is no such thing as SQL*NET aliases/service names! This means applications own to arduous code the actual server designation into their apps, making it difficult to mosey databases later to load equipoise across servers." Acquaint yourself with NetLib or you could even alias at the DNS server. In any case, at the very least if you're having to arduous code server names instead of using a registry or some form of properties file and making this a variable in the app these coding habits leave something to exist desired anyway.
"In SQL Server there is no "dead connection detection". Clients who lose their connection may quiet hold locks until a DBA is notified to assassinate their server side processes." I've seen the very issues in Oracle, this depends more on the application touching the dB than the specific database vendor.
@@error is a system defined variable to hold the ultimate error and is by no means the only routine of trapping and handling exceptions in SQL Server.
Off the soap box for now. :)
David H. writes: I disagree with the feedback that asserted this was not a comparison but a SQL Server bashing exercise. I own some sustain with PL/SQL and zilch with SQL Server, and was interested to learn the the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two systems. This articale has not achieved that. It is only half an article.
Seetharaman S. writes: For two days before reading this, I was thinking about exactly the very thing. Surprised to discern this today. I own worked and am working on Oracle and SQL databases and I find it difficult to handle SQL databases when the size of the DB goes beyond 4-8 GB. Even indexes are not efficient. They conclude a monthly process that initially takes 3 hours to complete. Subsequently after running it for two more months, it is taking something around 7 hours to 18 hours. Not joking at all, they tried again and again for the very month before restarting the system. They did and finally it took 3 hours and 39 mins. The DBAs job with respect to SQL Server is bit difficult and at times was not able to reply where and what goes wrong. The other day, I had problem with the SQL server Agent and I establish out that it was related to the DTS and NT Fibers option. On another occassion, during installation, using the control panel, I removed the SQL server and restarted more than 10 times. Finally, I realized that some parameter in the registry had a '1' value so that I was not able to effect a fresh installation. Also, while processing cubes, as you said, when they collect huge data, it locks the select statement triggered in some other connectivity. Although SQL Server has noteworthy user-friendly screens and installation advancements, it lacks Enterprise Puree, which is nowadays in demand.
Scott T. writes: I disagree with Patrick M that this is simple SQL Server bashing and is far too one-sided to exist taken seriously. I deem myself as an Oracle DBA and disagree with some of the comments, but there are few details about which features are better in SQL Server than Oracle other than the summary provided. To add to Patrick's comments/corrections, you *can* alias SQL Servers via DNS so applications don't requisite to own the server designation "hard coded".
I would love Eli to expound why he considers Oracle better than SQL Server "for both OLTP and data warehouse applications" when SQL Server holds nearly every tpc benchmark, both clustered and non-clustered? M$'s best pains is about 709K vs Oracle's best pains of about 428K, and Oracle is about $3 per transaction more expensive in these configurations!! moreover he fails to mention that although Oracle clustering technology is good, it moreover costs lots of $$$ through its licensing scheme.
Joe Y. writes: Are you confident the author isn't an Oracle employee? I've been an Oracle DBA, SQL DBA, and am now playing with other stuff, including an spicy toy called MySQL. Sure, there are pros and cons to Oracle and SQL, and a few of the points raised here are even valid but really, the "tip" in general looks love a typical Oracle marketing flyer.
The author responds: As a DBA in both Oracle and SQL Server, I tried in this article to find all the things that exist in Oracle but not in SQL Server. Oracle surely has more functionality and is more age than MS SQL Server but there are some points in favour of SQL Server:
1) Self-tuning, with update statistics checked and auto create statistics.
2) User functions that can operate moreover as parametric views
3) Insert...Exec stored procedure format that Oracle does not own with the INSERT statement
4) Identity column
5) Very intuitive learning; i.e., it's easier to learn than Oracle.
6) Linked servers are really much easier to implement than external procedures in Oracle.About the Author
Eli Leiba works at the Israel Electric Company as a senior application DBA in Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server. He has certifications from Microsoft and BrainBench in Oracle and SQL Server database administration and implementation. Mr. Leiba holds a B.S. in computer science and has 11 years of sustain working in the database field. Additionally, Mr. Leiba teaches SQL Server DBA and development courses at the Microsoft CTEC and serves as a senior database consultant for several Israeli start-up companies.For More Information
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11781906
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1BF
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12442857
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/12/pass4sure-311-019-real-question-bank.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/Pass4sure311-019DumpsAndPracticeTestsWithRealQuestions
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/9tquskvr7yfjaq84b9zqxvktb5yig3c9
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/669w0430ea008a8c0451388c39fb580617d9c