A2010-502 exam Dumps Source : Assess: IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager for Mobile Devices V2.1 Implementation
Test Code : A2010-502
Test name : Assess: IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager for Mobile Devices V2.1 Implementation
Vendor name : IBM
: 90 actual Questions
what's simplest passage to apportion together and pass A2010-502 exam?
preparing for A2010-502 books may exist a tough system and nine out of ten possibilities are that youll fail in case you accomplish it with not a bit suitable guidance. Thats in which satisfactory A2010-502 ebook is available in! It offers you with green and groovy records that now not handiest complements your steerage but additionally offers you a effortless reduce hazard of passing your A2010-502 download and entering into any university with not a bit despair. I organized through this excellent software program and that iscored forty two marks out of fifty. I can guarantee you that its going to never can abet you down!
located A2010-502 actual question source.
Im no longer an aficionado of on-line killexams.com, in light of the verisimilitude that theyre often posted through flighty folks who misdirect I into studying stuff I neednt pains with and missing things that I genuinely exigency to understand. Notkillexams.com . This organisation gives absolutely big killexams.com that assist me overcome A2010-502 exam preparation. This is the manner by means of which I passed this exam from the second one attempt to scored 87% marks. Thank you
These A2010-502 dumps works in the actual test.
Im able to recommend you to disappear back prerogative right here to apportion off total fears related to A2010-502 certification because that is a exceptional platform to present you with assured objects to your arrangements. I used to exist concerned for A2010-502 exam however total passage to killexams.com who provided me with top notch merchandise for my education. I used to exist definitely concerned about my fulfillment but it emerge as first-class A2010-502 exam engine that elevated my success self faith and now im feeling delight in this unconditional help. Hats off to you and your improbable services for total students and specialists!
Right plot to derive A2010-502 actual test question paper.
I passed. right, the exam become tough, so I simply got past it attributable to killexams.com and examSimulator. i am upbeat to document that I passed the A2010-502 exam and feature as of past due obtained my statement. The framework questions were the component i was most harassed over, so I invested hours honing on thekillexams.com exam simulator. It beyond any doubt helped, as consolidated with discrete segments.
precisely selfsame questions in actual test, WTF!
if you exigency lofty best A2010-502 dumps, then killexams.com is the final preference and your most effective solution. it givesincredible and awesome test dumps which i am pronouncing with complete self assurance. I usually notion that A2010-502 dumps are of no makes spend of however killexams.com proved me wrong because the dumps supplied by them were of super spend and helped me marks high. in case you are disturbing for A2010-502 dumps as rightly, then you want now not to dismay and exist section of killexams.
A2010-502 exam is no more difficult to pass with these .
killexams.com had enabled a pleasurable revel in the gross while I used A2010-502 prep resource from it. I observed the study publications, exam engine and, the A2010-502 to each tiniest cramped detail. It was due to such excellent passage that I became talented in the A2010-502 exam curriculum in matter of days and were given the A2010-502 certification with an excellent marks. I am so thankful to every unmarried man or woman in the back of the killexams.com platform.
Read books for A2010-502 erudition but ensure your success with these .
i was so much idle and didnt want to work difficult and always searched brief cuts and convenient strategies. when i was doing an IT route A2010-502 and it become very tough for me and didnt able to ascertain any manual line then i heard aboutthe web site which were very distinguished within the marketplace. I got it and my troubles eliminated in few days when Icommenced it. The sample and exercise questions helped me plenty in my prep of A2010-502 tests and that i correctly secured top marks as nicely. That was simply due to the killexams.
No questions became asked that turned into now not in my manual.
I asked my brother to give me some counsel regarding my A2010-502 test and he told me to buckle up since I was in for a powerful ride. He gave me this killexams.coms address and told me that was total I needed in order to build confident that I limpid my A2010-502 test and that too with amenable marks. I took his counsel and signed up and Im so ecstatic that I did it since my A2010-502 test went Amazing and I passed with amenable score. It was dote a dream Come precise so thank you.
determined maximum A2010-502 Questions in present day-day dumps that I organized.
It is high-quality revel in for the A2010-502 exam. With now not masses stuff to exist had online, Im satisfied I maintain been given killexams.com. The questions/solutions are really great. With killexams.com, the exam maintain become very clean, remarkable.
much less effort, fanciful expertise, assured success.
Im so joyous I bought A2010-502 exam prep. The A2010-502 exam is difficult seeing that its very huge, and the questions cowl the entirety you spot within the blueprint. killexams.com become my foremost instruction source, and they cover everything flawlessly, and there were lots of related questions on the exam.
IBM is making its first buy of 2011 today with acquisition of precise property management application developer Tririga. fiscal terms of the deal, which is anticipated to nearby within the second quarter of 2011, maintain been now not disclosed.
Tririga’s utility helps consumers build strategic planning choices involving belt usage, evaluate option actual estate initiatives, generate larger returns from capital tasks, and assess environmental maintain an upshot on investments. IBM says that property and actual estate typically represents the 2nd-biggest rate on an organization’s income observation, after worker compensation. Tririga’s utility helps businesses streamlines and Cut these fees.
Tririga’s application is used by using more than 200 clients, including over one-third of Fortune one hundred businesses as well as seven of the 15 federal executive departments of the U.S. executive.Tririga might exist integrated into IBM Tivoli utility and IBM world company functions.
In 2010, IBM spent roughly $6 billion to purchase 17 groups, so it'll exist exciting to peer what acquisition’s are up expansive Blue’s sleeve in 2011.
CARY, N.C.--(business WIRE)--Autonomic substances, a GSA IaaS Cloud provider has lately performed the captious contractual agreements with IBM to permit for SaaS enablement of IBM’s application assets. utilising Autonomic’s ARC-P cloud as the start method, executive groups will soon exist in a position to build the most of IBM applied sciences in utility based mostly, elastic compute offerings. Autonomic has originally determined to focal point on a few of the Tivoli software assets together with: Tivoli Endpoint manager (TEM formerly BigFix), Tivoli id manager (TIM), Tivoli entry supervisor (TAM), and Federated identification supervisor (FIM). too included within the ARC-Platform can exist items from the Tivoli Maximo household.
Autonomic worked diligently with IBM to leverage its GSA IaaS ARC-P cloud to enable government consumers access to applied sciences in an as-provider mannequin. The amalgam of transferring budgetary pursuits, conditional funding streams, and cloud first / future first coverage initiatives has pushed the want for utility based mostly compute. one of the vital key benefits recognized in cloud computing is that govt won't should overhaul its software and hardware each few years, disposing of political, budgetary and integration complications.
“The traditional reseller model is below-going big trade; the capacity to readily flip paper orders over is straight away losing value within the channel. IBM has indicated it is looking for channel companions that can carry more for the consumer. The capacity to SaaS permit IBM belongings is a key differentiator that Autonomic dropped at the desk.” mentioned John Keese President of Autonomic materials. “We retract note the safety necessities, grasp the suitable contracts, and maintain the confiscate cloud platform to deliver this for IBM and their purchasers. we're quicker and more nimble, and it is why we're first to their market with these offerings.”
Autonomic plans to SaaS permit a few the items and should no longer exist constrained to IBM items simplest. extra offerings encompass a number of industry Open source stacks as well as Microsoft exchange and Autonomy E-Discovery. Autonomic might exist applying the identical govt safety processing it has beneath long past for its IaaS platform to its SaaS decisions.
About Autonomic components
Autonomic materials (www.autonomicresources.com) is a Public Cloud company and emerging expertise integration capabilities enterprise that works with the U.S. federal government. Autonomic is certified eight(a) SDB - Search GSA time table #GS-35F-0587R on http://www.gsaadvantage.gov and http://www.apps.gov.
The boost in the quantity and diversity of related devices has made industry IT environments a amenable deal extra complicated.
maintaining protection and compliance is a difficult hardship and IoT protection professional ForeScout is integrating with IBM security options to present users stringer endpoint insurance policy and automated risk mitigation.
ForeScout extended Module for the IBM BigFix endpoint administration platform offers actual-time endpoint visibility and control past BigFix-managed endpoints to consist of unmanaged gadgets corresponding to BYOD, IoT, network infrastructure and operational expertise methods.
It verifies the presence and operation of BigFix brokers on supported company endpoints using ForeScout and can token up, restart, or remediate to exist confident utterly purposeful brokers on the time the gadget connects.
It additionally monitors the configuration and compliance of BigFix-managed devices and complements ForeScout's agentless assessment of gadgets that are not managed by using BigFix, to preserve compliance with industry and regulatory necessities.
If both ForeScout or BigFix determines that a utensil is non-compliant, it'll isolate or quarantine the gadget the usage of ForeScout, and initiate host or network remediation movements before allowing acceptable network access.
"if you occur to combine the purview of community-linked instruments with the growing to exist variety of trade necessities and compliance regulations, the stop result can exist a security nightmare with out the means to establish and examine endpoints," says Pedro Abreu, senior vp and chief passage officer at ForeScout. "we've teamed up with IBM BigFix to give an integrated solution that maximizes security effectiveness via better endpoint insurance with optimized endpoint discovery, administration and continuous coverage enforcement, assuaging the compliance burden on protection groups."
which you could find out extra concerning the integration on the ForeScout website.
photograph credit score: Ahmetov_Ruslan / Shutterstock
While it is very arduous job to pick responsible certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people derive ripoff due to choosing wrong service. Killexams.com build it confident to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients Come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and attribute because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client assurance is captious to us. Specially they retract care of killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If you survey any wrong report posted by their competitors with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something dote this, just preserve in wit that there are always bad people damaging reputation of amenable services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams drill questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their sample questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
000-299 drill exam | 000-N36 braindumps | C2150-200 VCE | 642-427 drill Test | 000-163 sample test | C4090-461 brain dumps | 70-638 exam questions | CPAT free pdf | HP2-K40 dumps questions | 70-705 questions answers | 050-565 actual questions | 000-119 questions and answers | HP3-F18 study guide | 920-471 free pdf | 920-157 test prep | LOT-405 study guide | 1Y0-740 braindumps | LOT-956 free pdf | Rh202 cram | HH0-300 braindumps |
killexams.com A2010-502 Brain Dumps with actual Questions
Our A2010-502 exam prep material gives you total that you should retract a certification exam. Their IBM A2010-502 Exam will give you exam questions with confirmed answers that reflect the actual exam. lofty caliber and incentive for the A2010-502 Exam. They at killexams.com ensured to enable you to pass your A2010-502 exam with lofty scores.
Are you looking for IBM A2010-502 Dumps of actual questions for the Assess: IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager for Mobile Devices V2.1 Implementation Exam prep? They provide most updated and attribute A2010-502 Dumps. Detail is at http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/A2010-502. They maintain compiled a database of A2010-502 Dumps from actual exams in order to let you prepare and pass A2010-502 exam on the first attempt. Just memorize their and relax. You will pass the exam.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for total exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for total Orders
killexams.com maintain their pros Team to ensure their IBM A2010-502 exam questions are reliably the latest. They are total in total to a powerful degree close with the exams and testing center.
How killexams.com preserve IBM A2010-502 exams updated?: they maintain their extraordinary ways to deal with know the latest exams information on IBM A2010-502. Once in a while they contact their accessories especially OK with the testing heart or now and again their customers will email us the most recent information, or they got the latest update from their dumps suppliers. When they find the IBM A2010-502 exams changed then they update them ASAP.
In case you really miss the designate this A2010-502 Assess: IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager for Mobile Devices V2.1 Implementation and would gaunt toward not to sit tense for the updates then they can give you complete refund. in any case, you should ship your score reply to us with the objective that they can maintain a check. At the point when will I derive my A2010-502 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment, your username/password are sent at your email address within 5 min. It may retract cramped longer if your bank detain in payment authorization.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for total exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for total Orders
A2010-502 Practice Test | A2010-502 examcollection | A2010-502 VCE | A2010-502 study guide | A2010-502 practice exam | A2010-502 cram
Killexams 00M-233 braindumps | Killexams 700-101 test prep | Killexams 000-210 exam prep | Killexams 2V0-621 pdf download | Killexams M2090-733 bootcamp | Killexams 650-256 test questions | Killexams HP2-037 questions and answers | Killexams ST0-47W examcollection | Killexams HP3-C32 dump | Killexams 190-849 braindumps | Killexams C2010-579 free pdf | Killexams 70-516-CSharp free pdf download | Killexams MB5-292 drill test | Killexams C4040-122 test prep | Killexams NS0-141 free pdf | Killexams 9A0-148 actual questions | Killexams 650-754 braindumps | Killexams 9L0-402 dumps | Killexams M8010-663 actual questions | Killexams NCIDQ drill questions |
Killexams 9L0-506 brain dumps | Killexams 650-294 exam questions | Killexams A2040-925 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-204 actual questions | Killexams FM0-306 questions and answers | Killexams MD0-251 study guide | Killexams 7303-1 study guide | Killexams HP2-H40 drill test | Killexams 117-102 free pdf | Killexams P2070-071 test questions | Killexams A2040-928 braindumps | Killexams RCDD dumps | Killexams 000-294 mock exam | Killexams 050-895 actual questions | Killexams HP0-W01 cram | Killexams 000-N17 actual questions | Killexams 000-237 drill questions | Killexams 000-R25 questions and answers | Killexams C2020-002 dumps questions | Killexams 000-959 cheat sheets |
Russell L. Jones
In the organized chaos of e-business back systems, enterprise access management (EAM) vendors counsel they present the "Holy Grail" of security: a lone sign-on (SSO) solution that authenticates users to your Web portal and authorizes access to captious back-end applications.
But your quest doesn't stop when you purchase an EAM solution. There is no miracle in that box.
The benefits of EAM are clear. Market-leading products from Netegrity, RSA Security, IBM/Tivoli and others provide captious security and management functions including role-based access control, content personalization, user self-registration and hooks into other security products, such as firewalls, provisioning systems and IDSes. Many EAM solutions can ply multiple authentication options (e.g., user ID/passwords, digital certificates, authentication tokens) and several types of user repositories (LDAP, RACF, NT, etc.). These solutions too present auditing services and intuitive Web-based interfaces for user and resource management. In short, you can build a compelling industry case for EAM, and thousands of organizations are rolling out these solutions today.
Despite these and other benefits, making EAM software work in a heterogeneous enterprise is a knotty challenge. Whether your organization is a bank, a health care provider, an insurance agency or another industry enterprise, unanticipated issues are almost confident to impact rollout. Getting the most bang for your buck requires significant up-front architectural planning and design, infrastructure investments, process reengineering, training and a change leadership strategy. The bottom line is that implementation is neither as simple nor as effortless as some vendors would maintain you believe.The Benefits: What EAM Can Do
EAM products can bring order to what is often a chaotic Web-based enterprise system. Understanding the core capabilities of these products will abet you match your industry requirements to the prerogative solution and build the case for purchase.
1. lone sign-on can exist achieved across Web-based applications. SSO has been an elusive goal for security practitioners since the advent of client/server computing. Prior to the Internet, a number of products -- typically based on knotty scripting languages-attempted to address SSO for mainframe, midrange and client-server environments. Behind the scenes, these products were actually storing the user IDs and passwords of each user for each application that they needed to access. In knotty IT environments, implementation was difficult and administration onerous.
EAM products address this issue in different ways. Netegrity's SiteMinder 4.6 and RSA's ClearTrust SecureControl 4.6.1 (formerly owned by Securant Technologies) provide SSO across Web applications residing on different Web servers -- within the selfsame domain only -- using a secure, nonpersistent, encrypted cookie on the client interface. Assuming that each of the Web servers is protected by an agent, the cookie is presented to each application that the user wants to access.
IBM/Tivoli's Policy Director 3.7.1 takes a different approach. A secure credential is built for the user on Policy Director's WebSeal, a transpose proxy that sits in front of the Web server. The credential is presented each time a user attempts to access Policy Director-protected Web applications.
Each of these three vendors is planning on supporting both the cookie- and proxy-based SSO methods in upcoming releases.
2. Authorization logic can exist absorbed out of the applications. EAM solutions provide basic centralized authorization to give users access to multiple Web-based applications. For example, Tivoli's Policy Director provides an "entitlement" service that will dynamically build a list of total applications that a user is "authorized" to access.
The entitlement page is built once the user has been authenticated by Policy Director. Policy Director may protect dozens of applications, but the user will only survey links to the applications that he is "entitled" to access.
SecureControl 4.6.1 has a particularly enchanting feature for authorization called "Smart Rules," which provide "dynamic permissioning." This means SecureControl can change a user's authorizations at runtime based on variable data, such as current credit balance.
3. Content can exist personalized. EAM-based content personalization can change the access interface or system actions based on user information. For example, when a user attempts to access a Web application, additional information (attributes) can exist passed to deliver a personalized response. For instance, if User A belongs to the Senior Payroll Analyst group, his HTML page will array four buttons for four different types of payroll transactions to exist executed. If User B belongs to the Junior Payroll Analyst group, he will survey only two buttons.
Developers can code the application to build spend of this capability. One condition health care agency, for example, made this a fundamental requirement for Web-based access to three key applications for customers and employees.
In order to extend this functionality, many EAM vendors are working on developing hooks into measure portal applications such as Epicentric, PlumTree, BroadVision, Vignette and ATG. Netegrity recently acquired DataChannel, a portal vendor.
4. Administration functions can exist delegated. One of the most valuable features of EAM solutions is the capacity to delegate security administration. This is particularly valuable when you want to delegate authority for a hosted application to a industry partner.
The leading EAM solutions total maintain robust delegated administration capabilities. RSA's ClearTrust Secure Control excels in this, and Netegrity has significantly improved this function in Delegated Management Services 2.0.
The potential cost savings could exist significant depending on how many industry partners would otherwise exist centrally administered.Caveats: What EAMs Can't Do
Though EAM solutions maintain impressive capabilities, they too maintain limitations. Knowing these shortcomings will abet you set realistic expectations, build smart purchasing decisions and contrivance for integration.
1. It's not plug-and-play. Some EAM vendors brag about how quickly their product can exist up and running out of the box. In one case, a vendor claimed that they could accomplish it in under a day at the client's site. What the vendor didn't counsel was that meant a stand-alone NT server connected to no applications, with only a couple of test users.
The reality is that much planning, architecture and design is needed to implement any of the EAM solutions in a knotty environment:
Even "simple" implementations will countenance issues that impact the project. For example, one insurance company required Web-based authentication to a lone application only, without knotty levels of authorization. Nevertheless, the firm quiet had plenty of knotty integration issues to deal with.
2. EAM doesn't deliver knotty authorizations out of the box. No EAM product addresses knotty authorization logic without customization. The degree of custom authorization code depends on the EAM solution and the complexity of your application. Often, custom code in the application will exist needed to invoke the authorization engine through the vendor API, which could require a significant amount of development.
3.Cross-domain interoperability is a problem. One of the biggest gaps in the EAM space is the inability to pass security credentials between different EAM/custom Web security solutions. In a likely scenario, a customer logs on to your Web portal, protected by EAM Solution A, to conduct a transaction. But information needed to complete the transaction must exist obtained from a industry partner's site, protected by EAM Solution B. When the customer clicks your industry partner's link within your portal, he will most likely exist required to re-authenticate, since the security credential generated by one product isn't recognized by the other.
An XML-based protocol, SAML, is being developed to address this issue (more on this later).People and Processes Count
Perhaps the biggest block to EAM deployment is underestimating the scope of the project.
EAM solutions impact three captious parts of any business: people, process and technology. Typically, the technology gets most of the attention and the people and processes are given short shrift. If that happens, the project will falter, and the results won't approach the goals for the implementation, at least not without a lot of extra time, money and aggravation. Focusing on three captious areas before implementation begins will abet assure success:
Deploying EAM involves everyone from systems managers and developers to stop users. A change leadership strategy should comprise a communications plan, a training contrivance and a stakeholder analysis. Everyone in the organization should understand their roles and responsibilities and receive confiscate training.Learned in the Trenches: Making EAM Work
There are several basic steps that lay the foundation for a smooth and successful EAM deployment.
1. Invest time in architectural analysis and design. EAM implementation can maintain a profound upshot on current and future IT architectures. Understanding how EAM will exist integrated will weigh in getting it prerogative the first time. Key architectural elements to reckon include:
Assuming you are integrating multiple applications, you'll want your LDAP schema to exist complete on the first pass. Analyzing applications that will Come under the EAM umbrella will reveal common data elements that determine authorization decisions. Such a data constituent may exist a user role that means the selfsame exact thing to multiple applications (e.g., "claims adjuster"). The results of this analysis will exist direct inputs into the schema design for the EAM product's user repository (e.g., LDAP).
Without this analysis, the schema design will most likely exist tightly coupled with the first application integrated with the EAM product. When the second and third applications are on deck for deployment, the schema will maintain to exist modified to accommodate those applications' authentication and authorization requirements. That, in turn, could require recoding the first application. The result is delay, and a lot of extra time and money.
2. anticipate bugs. Fastest to market wins. Software vendors ramp up their evolution cycle to beat the competition to market. attribute assurance suffers, and the result is often software bugs.
It's reasonable to anticipate to encounter bugs and contrivance for them in an EAM implementation. Vendors conduct much of their testing in greenfield environments. Even with strong testing and QA, vendors will never exist able to find every bug simply because of the diversity and complexity of the IT environments in which their products are deployed.
The project contrivance should allow sufficient time for unit and string testing the solution. The string testing of the EAM solution should exist linked to the application's string testing, and thus coordinated with the application deployment team.
3. Double estimates for evolution efforts. Much of the excitement surrounding EAM is the vow that authorization logic can exist absorbed from applications and deployed within the EAM solution. In theory, this would redeem on evolution effort, since reusable authorization logic could exist invoked by any application that needed it. But EAM products aren't yet at this stage. contrivance on a lot of evolution time.
The most effective passage to determine how much evolution application is required is to accumulate total of the functional authentication and authorization requirements for the applications to exist integrated. Combined with spend cases describing how the application will work, the functional security requirements should provide a amenable assess of the evolution time, including custom security coding. As a rule of thumb, double that estimate. It's not unusual for knotty EAM rollouts to retract several months from purchase to initial launch.
4. Create measure interfaces. Many EAM solutions provide security APIs to enable applications to invoke security functionality beyond what you derive out of the box. But these aren't measure APIs, so contrivance on a learning curve for developers. More importantly, the application itself will exist bound to that API, so the application code must exist rewritten if one EAM solution is replaced with another, or if the application/platform is upgraded to a current release.
Creating an application isolation layer via measure interfaces will reduce the exigency for costly and time-consuming re-engineering by shielding applications from vendor-specific code.
Looking ahead, an extension to the Java security model called Java Authentication and Authorization Service (JAAS) addresses this issue.
5. Build security from the bottom up. Many organizations don't derive the complete profit of EAM because there isn't a well-defined design for the security process that exploits the complete purview of EAM authorization functionality. Or, sometimes the security design isn't integrated with the application evolution team's systems evolution life cycle (SDLC).
In either case, the evolution team will exist hard-pressed to disappear back and redesign its application if and when security requirements are introduced. Changing requirements for a Web-based cash management application, for example, hindered integration at a major banking institution. The result is detain or, worse, a deployment that only takes handicap of the product's basic authentication features.
Contrast this with a success story-a site in which the security process was integrated into the evolution team's SDLC from the earliest stages of evolution planning. This "security-aware" SDLC was accessible to the organization's evolution community via their intranet. At each angle of the SDLC, the EAM implementation team guided the developers through the pertinent security process points. The result was a robust EAM implementation, unimpeded by changing requirements.Where Is EAM Technology Headed?
As EAM solutions evolve, anticipate captious current features, functionality and integration with complementary security technologies.
Interoperability among EAM products is a problem in search of a solution. It's captious to establish a passage to jump from a host Web site to a industry partner's Web site without having to re-authenticate. EAM vendors such as Oblix, IBM/Tivoli, Netegrity, RSA Security, Entrust and Entegrity are working on an XML solution for the exchange of authentication and authorization information among EAM products.
The protocol, noted above, is called Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML), and is being sponsored by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS). SAML defines a common language for describing authentication and authorization "assertions." terminal fall, Netegrity released a Java-based SAML developer toolkit called JSAML.
As mentioned above, Java Authentication and Authorization Service (JAAS) enables developers to implement authentication and access control functionality while minimizing vendor-specific coding within the application. This will allow customers to switch EAM vendors and/or upgrade their applications or platforms without extensive recoding. Leading EAM vendors such as IBM/Tivoli and Netegrity already provide back for JAAS.
Application server authentication and authorization will exist employed by EAM products to provide granular access control out of the box. Many high-end application servers -- such as BEA's WebLogic Enterprise edition and iPlanet's Application Server Enterprise Edition -- provide their own indigenous authentication and authorization security mechanisms. However, these mechanisms can only exist leveraged by the applications written on the application server platform. Thus, other platforms, such as client/server and legacy systems, would quiet exigency to exist secured and managed by yet another security solution.
When an application server's security system is integrated with an EAM vendor's solution, the result is one centrally managed, policy-based security solution that allows security policy to exist applied and managed across Web-based, client/server and legacy applications. Examples of this kindhearted of integration are between IBM/Tivoli's Policy Director with IBM's WebSphere, Entegrity's AssureAccess and RSA's ClearTrust SecureControl's with BEA's WebLogic application server, and Oblix's NetPoint with iPlanet's application server.
Other EAM enhancements on the horizon include:
These global enhancements, coupled with the evolution of specific product features, bolster the case for EAM. With the prerogative amount of intelligence and effort, EAM becomes a viable security solution for today's e-business, with the vow of better things to come.Goliaths Vie for 'Net SSO Supremacy
Microsoft and Sun Microsystems are pumping emulate plans for global SSO authentication to prime commerce on the Internet. Consumer and industry users would maintain a lone profile that would concede access to services across the 'Net, using any platform.
Microsoft's Passport, section of its .NET My Services initiative, already has a foundation of 165 million accounts, amassed largely from automatic registrations signing up for Hotmail and Instant Messaging. The company's latest OS, Windows XP, continually prompts users to register for this service.
Sun's Liberty Alliance, announced in October, started with 50 companies, including Bank of America, GM and United Airlines. The Alliance would allow a user to token up at a secure interface and access customized information services.
AOL Time Warner, the third player in the arena, hopes to leverage its 31 million subscribers to build its Magic Carpet the standard.Health care case study: The personal touch
RSA's SecureControl makes delegated administration a no-brainer.
Health care providers are particularly sensitive to security because of federally mandated protection of patient information under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Transmitting sensitive medical data across the Internet, intranets and extranets leaves no margin for error.
A condition government chose RSA Security's ClearTrust SecureControl 4.6.1 because it delivers on EAM's value in providing delegated administration and personalization. When the job was done, both patients and internal users had secure, lone sign-on access to applications of three state-run health care providers through a Web portal. Authorization and personalization for total three applications was managed via dynamic, customized JSP Web pages.
Delegated administration is a major energy of SecureControl. Its module provides an easy-to-use Web interface to create users quickly. This function can exist delegated to other administrators within an organization or at a industry partner site, which relieves the burden of routine functions from central administration and can reduce costs substantially over time. The robustness and flexibility of the Delegated Administration module maintain earned lofty marks in the industry, making it a amenable match for this agency.
Using the SecureControl JDK library, the agency added a custom-built delegated administration Web interface to its measure user interface. SecureControl's delegated administration provided procedures that conformed to agency security policy.
There was an issue with personalization, however. The agency's Web page personalization displays the user's complete name and dynamically filters links, so the user sees only what he's authorized to access. SecureControl's Runtime API was used to filter the links, but couldn't tug basic user information, such as first and terminal name, from its LDAP user repository. The agency used SecureControl's Admin API to complete the task, which made the JSP pages heavier, since it was making calls to both objects. Also, the Admin API is used to upshot captious changes to user data, and employing it in this context made the pages more sensitive.
The agency's user store was another major issue, since Secure Control doesn't maintain indigenous back for LDAP v3-compliant directories. Secure Control provides for data synchronization between Oracle and LDAP, so the solution user information was replicated in an Oracle database. However, this made managing and manipulating data attributes difficult. RSA plans indigenous LDAP v3 back in its next release to address this problem.Case study: Insuring success
Insurance company's "simple" Policy Director implementation shows the exigency to anticipate the unexpected.
There's no such thing as a simple EAM implementation. There's no such thing as plug-and-play.
The installation of IBM/Tivoli's Policy Director 3.7.1 at a major insurance company was about as straightforward as an EAM deployment can get: derive Policy Director up and running with one e-business application within nine weeks. Still, there were significant obstacles to deployment. The implementation team met the deadline -- but not without some ache -- and eventually integrated additional applications.
As with many EAM deployments, the insurance company was a "traditional" industry that wanted to expand its e-business component. To accomplish so, it needed to simplify access and authorization -- securely. The company started with what was, in effect, a pilot project for Policy Director. The firm required authentication to a Web-based version of a mainframe quoting application used by customer services representatives and insurance agents to process automobile insurance quotes. The security integration for the e-business application was fairly simple, using only the most basic EAM capabilities. Policy Director only authenticated the user against the LDAP, while the Java servlet that handled security continued to check if the user was authorized to survey the quote.
Since Policy Director is a transpose proxy product -- compared to the agent-based SiteMinder and SecureControl -- it doesn't matter what sort of Web server is being protected. That's a expansive plus for potential users concerned about back for existing platforms. In this case, since both the Web and application servers were too IBM products, the point may exist moot, but it opens a limpid path to bring in other products.
Out of the box, Policy Director provides an authentication layer for applications, with its WebSeal sitting in front of the Web server. Ironically, in an end-to-end IBM environment, the first issue arose when the junction between the WebSeal and IBM WebSphere application server was created. The company was unable to create a connection between the browser and the quoting application on the application server. This turned out to exist a mapping issue resulting from an undocumented configuration detail. Updating WebSphere's Virtual Host mapping tables solved the problem.
Core dumps on one of the WebSeals brought the system down and Cut connections to protected back-end resources on two occasions. Redundant WebSeals, along with frequent monitoring, mitigated the problem. IBM/Tivoli says it addresses the issue in its current release, Policy Director 3.8.
Policy Director did a impecunious job of allowing user attributes to exist added to provide granular access control, but has too addressed this in v3.8. Policy Director automatically provided two variables, IV-User and IV-Groups (user and group/role IDs), which were passed as HTTP headers to the back-end application. Policy Director recognized only user ID, password and a few other attributes within the LDAP.
SiteMinder and SecureControl provide out-of-the-box capacity to define custom user attributes for authentication and authorization.Case study: Banking on a solution
Financial institution cashes in on Netegrity's SiteMinder.
Financial institutions are prime candidates for EAM deployment. knotty levels of authorization are required for internal employees and customers dealing with everything from checking accounts to multi-million dollar industry loans.
The pecuniary institution for this case study is an older organization that has grown slowly into e-commerce as a passage to enhance more traditional methods of doing business. The bank wanted to deploy a Web-based application to allow individual and corporate customers to access current repositories as well as legacy systems.
Specifically, the bank wanted to develop a Web-based version of a cash management application on a WebSphere application server. The firm chose Netegrity's SiteMinder 4.5 to provide lone sign-on access and authorization.
When rolling out SiteMinder, the bank scholarly some valuable lessons the arduous way. EAM security should always exist integrated as section of the evolution contrivance before coding begins. In the bank's case, numerous changes in functional requirements for the cash management application -- a form of "project creep" -- slowed the SiteMinder integration. Application development, particularly custom coding to empower user requests through the EAM API, was inextricably bound to the integration. Changes in requirements had a cascading impact on implementation.
Difficulties with the configuration and maintenance of the WebSphere server, used for evolution of the application integration code, caused the most significant integration issues. Documentation was impecunious and configuration clumsy.
The SiteMinder agent for IBM HTTP servers was custom built for this project (support for IBM HTTP is included in the current version, SiteMinder 4.6). SiteMinder provides plug-ins on Web servers to provide URI-level security and application server agents (ASA) to protect resources, such as servlets or Enterprise Java Beans. The plug-in/ASA intercepts calls from a browser, and the SiteMinder Policy Server checks the database to survey if the requested resource is protected. If it is, the Policy Server first authenticates the user, then checks if the user is authorized to access the resource.
Several issues with SiteMinder itself highlighted the uniqueness and complexity of the deployment-and the exigency to contrivance accordingly:
About the author:Russell L. Jones, CISSP, is a senior manager with Deloitte & Touche's Secure E-Business consulting practice.
"For many enterprises, security is broken," said Tom Noonan, common manager IBM Internet Security Systems, in a statement released Thursday. "The nature of evolving threats is such that installing point solutions to 'keep the bad guys out' is no longer a viable passage to secure a business. They advocate current approaches to reduce complexities, reconcile to current industry imperatives and enable industry value versus just threat protection. The path to a more secure world begins with a risk management strategy that limits the impact of threats, improves industry resilience and creates an enterprise free of fear."
According to IBM, the current security strategy is the result of several recent acquisitions by the company in the security space. The strategy targets five broad areas of security, including information security; threat and vulnerability; application security; identity and access management; and physical security. In order to tackle these, the company has launched several current products and services, some in partnership with security firms. These include:
SRM includes dynamic risk quantification; peer group risk comparison; industry control optimization; security portfolio optimization (to abet assess weaknesses); and event risk calculation.
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vimeo : https://vimeo.com/240170834
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/a2010-502
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11402655
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-ew
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000XGRA
Scribd : https://www.scribd.com/document/356764182/Pass4sure-A2010-502-Braindumps-and-Practice-Tests-with-Real-Questions
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12023856
Youtube : https://youtu.be/oZzTKrfyX1o
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/10/ensure-your-success-with-this-a2010-502.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/DontMissTheseIbmA2010-502Dumps
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/pass4sure-a2010-502-assess-ibm-tivoli-endpoint-manager-for-mobile-devices-v2-1-implementation-exam-braindumps-with-real-questions-and-practice-software
Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/jj1xqkGtgno?hl=en
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/0049235269a6756748df8
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/txzqaet870a6sjdqty5fgo6ljput96x9
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5bym206164f2b67b34c9ab4c43d070d05d929
coursehero.com : "Excle"